// IN-DEPTH ICON LIBRARY COMPARISON

Ant Design Icons vs Simple Icons (2026)

When building modern web applications, choosing the right icon library can significantly impact both your application's aesthetic and its performance. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit Ant Design Icons against Simple Icons to help you make an informed decision for your React, Next.js, Vue, or Svelte project.

Together, these libraries represent some of the most popular open-source UI assets available today. Ant Design Icons boasts an impressive 840 icons (licensed under MIT), while Simple Icons counters with 3,200 highly-polished icons (licensed under CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)).

Below, we dive into the technical details: bundle size impacts, tree-shaking capabilities, TypeScript support, explicit commercial licensing rules, and real-world implementation examples.

Ant Design Icons
840
icons
8,700 stars · MIT
View full guide →
VS
Simple Icons
3,200
icons
25,047 stars · CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)
View full guide →

TECHNICAL FEATURE COMPARISON

When comparing Ant Design Icons and Simple Icons, developer experience features like TypeScript definitions and tree-shaking support are just as important as the icon count. Review the matrix below to see how they stack up.

FEATURE
Ant Design Icons
Simple Icons
Total Icons
840
3,200
GitHub Stars
8,700
25,047
License
MIT
CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)
TypeScript
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Tree Shakable
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Figma Plugin
✓ Yes
✗ No
Styles
outline, filled, twotone
filled
Frameworks
react, vue
react, nextjs

DESIGN AESTHETICS & VISUAL STYLE

Beyond the code, the visual identity of your application is heavily influenced by your choice of iconography. Ant Design Icons primarily features a outline aesthetic, whereas Simple Icons leans toward a filled look.

Ant Design Icons is designed with strict geometric rules and a consistent grid, ensuring that all 840 icons share the same visual weight. This makes it particularly well-suited for professional dashboards, enterprise SaaS products, and minimal user interfaces.

On the other hand, Simple Icons offers a more distinct personality. With its 3,200 carefully crafted icons, it can bring warmth and character to consumer-facing mobile apps, marketing websites, and creative portfolios.

LICENSING & COMMERCIAL USE DEEP-DIVE

Legal compliance is critical when selecting assets for a commercial software project. Understanding the nuances between the MIT license used by Ant Design Icons and the CC0 1.0 (Public Domain) license used by Simple Icons will ensure your project remains risk-free.

Ant Design IconsMIT

Ant Design Icons uses the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses. You can use it in any commercial project, modify the icons, and redistribute them freely. The only requirement is preserving the copyright notice in copies of the software.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
Simple IconsCC0 1.0 (Public Domain)

Simple Icons uses CC0 1.0 (Public Domain). All copyrights have been waived. You can copy, modify, distribute, and use the icons for any purpose — including commercial — without attribution.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
Read our complete Icon Library License Guide (MIT vs ISC vs Apache) →

PERFORMANCE & BUNDLE SIZE

Modern front-end frameworks like React and Next.js heavily penalize large JavaScript bundles. This makes tree-shaking—the ability of a bundler to remove unused code—a crucial factor when choosing between Ant Design Icons and Simple Icons.

  • Ant Design Icons Performance: Because Ant Design Icons supports tree-shaking, importing a single icon will only add a tiny fraction of a kilobyte to your final bundle. You can safely install the entire package without performance concerns.
  • Simple Icons Performance: Similarly, Simple Icons is fully tree-shakable. Your Webpack or Turbopack build step will strip out any unused icons, ensuring your First Contentful Paint (FCP) metrics remain exceptional.

REACT IMPORT SYNTAX & INTEGRATION

Here is how you actually write the code to import and use each library in a React or Next.js component. Both libraries offer distinct APIs and integration patterns.

Ant Design Icons Integration
import { SmileTwoTone } from '@ant-design/icons'

export default function App() {
  return <SmileTwoTone twoToneColor='#eb2f96' style={{ fontSize: '24px' }} />
}
Simple Icons Integration
import {
  SiGithub,
  SiVercel,
  SiStripe,
  SiReact,
  SiNextdotjs,
  SiTailwindcss,
} from '@icons-pack/react-simple-icons'
// All components use 'Si' prefix + PascalCase brand name

export function TechStack() {
  return (
    <div className="flex items-center gap-4">
      {/* Use currentColor — inherits from parent */}
      <SiGithub size={24} />
      <SiVercel size={24} />

      {/* Use official brand color */}
      <SiStripe size={24} color="#635BFF" />
      <SiReact size={24} color="#61DAFB" />

      {/* Social links row */}
      <a href="https://github.com" aria-label="GitHub">
        <SiGithub size={20} className="text-gray-600 hover:text-gray-900" />
      </a>
    </div>
  )
}

FINAL VERDICT: WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?

Still undecided? Here is our definitive breakdown of when to use Ant Design Icons versus when to opt for Simple Icons.

CHOOSE ANT DESIGN ICONS IF...
Three distinct themes
Native React components
Dynamic TwoTone coloring
Enterprise grade
CHOOSE SIMPLE ICONS IF...
3,109 brand icons — 6x more than Font Awesome Brands (465) at zero cost
CC0 public domain — no attribution required, no license notices, use in any commercial project
Official brand hex colors included — render SiStripe in #635BFF, SiGithub in #181717 with one prop
Works in Next.js Server Components — renders static SVG HTML with no use client required
Full TypeScript support — all 3,109 Si-prefixed components are typed with full VS Code autocomplete
Actively maintained — new brand icons added regularly, existing icons updated on rebrands

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Which is better: Ant Design Icons or Simple Icons?

Choosing between Ant Design Icons and Simple Icons depends entirely on your project's technical requirements and design aesthetic. Ant Design Icons provides 840 icons and is notable for three distinct themes, while Simple Icons offers 3,200 icons and is best known for 3,109 brand icons — 6x more than font awesome brands (465) at zero cost.

Are Ant Design Icons and Simple Icons completely free to use?

Yes. Both libraries are highly permissive open-source projects. Ant Design Icons is licensed under MIT, and Simple Icons is licensed under CC0 1.0 (Public Domain). Both licenses permit free commercial usage, modification, and redistribution in both personal and enterprise projects.

Do these libraries support TypeScript natively?

Yes, Ant Design Icons includes excellent built-in TypeScript definitions. Similarly, Simple Icons offers robust native TypeScript support for an improved developer experience.

OUR RECOMMENDATION

✓ CHOOSE ANT DESIGN ICONS IF YOU...
  • Need a library with 840 icons and outline/filled/twotone style options
  • Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
  • Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
  • Are building with react, vue
  • Need a Figma plugin for designer-developer handoff
✓ CHOOSE SIMPLE ICONS IF YOU...
  • Need a library with 3,200 icons and filled style options
  • Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
  • Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
  • Are building with react, nextjs

Still unsure? Try our interactive quiz to get a personalized recommendation, or search 350,000+ icons from both libraries side by side. You can also check our live stats dashboard for real-time download and GitHub star trends.

NPM INSTALLATION COMMANDS

Install Ant Design Icons
npm install @ant-design/icons
Install Simple Icons
npm install @icons-pack/react-simple-icons

RELATED RESOURCES

Ant Design Icons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideSimple Icons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideSearch 15,000+ Icons Across All Libraries InstantlyIcon Library License Guide — MIT vs Apache vs ISC ExplainedFind the Best Icons For Your Project — Interactive Wizard

EXPLORE MORE COMPARISONS

Ant Design Icons vs Lucide IconsAnt Design Icons vs HeroiconsAnt Design Icons vs Tabler IconsAnt Design Icons vs Phosphor IconsAnt Design Icons vs Remix IconAnt Design Icons vs Feather IconsAnt Design Icons vs Bootstrap IconsAnt Design Icons vs Radix IconsAnt Design Icons vs Font AwesomeAnt Design Icons vs React IconsAnt Design Icons vs Material IconsAnt Design Icons vs IconifyAnt Design Icons vs IconoirAnt Design Icons vs IonIconsAnt Design Icons vs Octicons