Elusive Icons vs Octicons (2026)
When building modern web applications, choosing the right icon library can significantly impact both your application's aesthetic and its performance. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit Elusive Icons against Octicons to help you make an informed decision for your React, Next.js, Vue, or Svelte project.
Together, these libraries represent some of the most popular open-source UI assets available today. Elusive Icons boasts an impressive 304 icons (licensed under OFL-1.1), while Octicons counters with 280 highly-polished icons (licensed under MIT).
Below, we dive into the technical details: bundle size impacts, tree-shaking capabilities, TypeScript support, explicit commercial licensing rules, and real-world implementation examples.
TECHNICAL FEATURE COMPARISON
When comparing Elusive Icons and Octicons, developer experience features like TypeScript definitions and tree-shaking support are just as important as the icon count. Review the matrix below to see how they stack up.
DESIGN AESTHETICS & VISUAL STYLE
Beyond the code, the visual identity of your application is heavily influenced by your choice of iconography. Elusive Icons primarily features a solid aesthetic, whereas Octicons leans toward a outline look.
Elusive Icons is designed with strict geometric rules and a consistent grid, ensuring that all 304 icons share the same visual weight. This makes it particularly well-suited for professional dashboards, enterprise SaaS products, and minimal user interfaces.
On the other hand, Octicons offers a more distinct personality. With its 280 carefully crafted icons, it can bring warmth and character to consumer-facing mobile apps, marketing websites, and creative portfolios.
LICENSING & COMMERCIAL USE DEEP-DIVE
Legal compliance is critical when selecting assets for a commercial software project. Understanding the nuances between the OFL-1.1 license used by Elusive Icons and the MIT license used by Octicons will ensure your project remains risk-free.
Elusive Icons uses the OFL-1.1 license, a permissive open-source license that allows free commercial use in web and mobile applications.
Octicons uses the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses. You can use it in any commercial project, modify the icons, and redistribute them freely. The only requirement is preserving the copyright notice in copies of the software.
PERFORMANCE & BUNDLE SIZE
Modern front-end frameworks like React and Next.js heavily penalize large JavaScript bundles. This makes tree-shaking—the ability of a bundler to remove unused code—a crucial factor when choosing between Elusive Icons and Octicons.
- Elusive Icons Performance: Because Elusive Icons supports tree-shaking, importing a single icon will only add a tiny fraction of a kilobyte to your final bundle. You can safely install the entire package without performance concerns.
- Octicons Performance: Similarly, Octicons is fully tree-shakable. Your Webpack or Turbopack build step will strip out any unused icons, ensuring your First Contentful Paint (FCP) metrics remain exceptional.
REACT IMPORT SYNTAX & INTEGRATION
Here is how you actually write the code to import and use each library in a React or Next.js component. Both libraries offer distinct APIs and integration patterns.
import 'elusive-icons/css/elusive-icons.min.css'
export default function App() {
return <i className='el el-home'></i>
}import { RepoIcon } from '@primer/octicons-react'
export default function App() {
return <RepoIcon size={16} />
}FINAL VERDICT: WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?
Still undecided? Here is our definitive breakdown of when to use Elusive Icons versus when to opt for Octicons.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Which is better: Elusive Icons or Octicons?
Choosing between Elusive Icons and Octicons depends entirely on your project's technical requirements and design aesthetic. Elusive Icons provides 304 icons and is notable for high contrast filled designs, while Octicons offers 280 icons and is best known for designed on strict 16px and 24px grid systems to prevent rendering blurriness.
Are Elusive Icons and Octicons completely free to use?
Yes. Both libraries are highly permissive open-source projects. Elusive Icons is licensed under OFL-1.1, and Octicons is licensed under MIT. Both licenses permit free commercial usage, modification, and redistribution in both personal and enterprise projects.
Do these libraries support TypeScript natively?
No, Elusive Icons does not natively provide TypeScript typings out of the box. Similarly, Octicons offers robust native TypeScript support for an improved developer experience.
OUR RECOMMENDATION
- Need a library with 304 icons and solid style options
- Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
- Are working with a JavaScript-only project
- Are building with react, vue, svelte, nextjs, vanilla
- Need a Figma plugin for designer-developer handoff
- Need a library with 280 icons and outline style options
- Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
- Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
- Are building with react, vue, nextjs, jekyll
Still unsure? Try our interactive quiz to get a personalized recommendation, or search 355,702 icons from both libraries side by side. You can also check our live stats dashboard for real-time download and GitHub star trends.
NPM INSTALLATION COMMANDS
npm install elusive-icons
npm install @primer/octicons-react