✨ Need a premium icon library? Check out Hugeicons Pro →
// IN-DEPTH ICON LIBRARY COMPARISON

Material Icons vs Feather Icons (2026)

When building modern web applications, choosing the right icon library can significantly impact both your application's aesthetic and its performance. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit Material Icons against Feather Icons to help you make an informed decision for your React, Next.js, Vue, or Svelte project.

Together, these libraries represent some of the most popular open-source UI assets available today. Material Icons boasts an impressive 2,100 icons (licensed under MIT), while Feather Icons counters with 287 highly-polished icons (licensed under MIT).

Below, we dive into the technical details: bundle size impacts, tree-shaking capabilities, TypeScript support, explicit commercial licensing rules, and real-world implementation examples.

Material Icons
2,100
icons
98,300 stars · MIT
View full guide →
VS
Feather Icons
287
icons
24,000 stars · MIT
View full guide →

TECHNICAL FEATURE COMPARISON

When comparing Material Icons and Feather Icons, developer experience features like TypeScript definitions and tree-shaking support are just as important as the icon count. Review the matrix below to see how they stack up.

FEATURE
Material Icons
Feather Icons
Total Icons
2,100
287
GitHub Stars
98,300
24,000
License
MIT
MIT
TypeScript
✓ Yes
✗ No
Tree Shakable
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Figma Plugin
✓ Yes
✗ No
Styles
filled, outlined, rounded, sharp, twotone
outline
Frameworks
react, nextjs
react, nextjs

LICENSING & COMMERCIAL USE DEEP-DIVE

Legal compliance is critical when selecting assets for a commercial software project. Understanding the nuances between the MIT license used by Material Icons and the MIT license used by Feather Icons will ensure your project remains risk-free.

Material IconsMIT

Material Icons uses the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses. You can use it in any commercial project, modify the icons, and redistribute them freely. The only requirement is preserving the copyright notice in copies of the software.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
Feather IconsMIT

Feather Icons uses the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses. You can use it in any commercial project, modify the icons, and redistribute them freely. The only requirement is preserving the copyright notice in copies of the software.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
Read our complete Icon Library License Guide (MIT vs ISC vs Apache) →

PERFORMANCE & BUNDLE SIZE

Modern front-end frameworks like React and Next.js heavily penalize large JavaScript bundles. This makes tree-shaking—the ability of a bundler to remove unused code—a crucial factor when choosing between Material Icons and Feather Icons.

  • Material Icons Performance: Because Material Icons supports tree-shaking, importing a single icon will only add a tiny fraction of a kilobyte to your final bundle. You can safely install the entire package without performance concerns.
  • Feather Icons Performance: Similarly, Feather Icons is fully tree-shakable. Your Webpack or Turbopack build step will strip out any unused icons, ensuring your First Contentful Paint (FCP) metrics remain exceptional.

REACT IMPORT SYNTAX & INTEGRATION

Here is how you actually write the code to import and use each library in a React or Next.js component. Both libraries offer distinct APIs and integration patterns.

Material Icons Integration
import HomeIcon from '@mui/icons-material/Home'
import HomeOutlinedIcon from '@mui/icons-material/HomeOutlined'
import SearchIcon from '@mui/icons-material/Search'
import DeleteIcon from '@mui/icons-material/Delete'

// ✅ Path imports — up to 6x faster in dev than barrel imports
// ❌ Avoid: import { HomeIcon } from '@mui/icons-material'

export default function App() {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* Filled — bold, solid, for primary actions */}
      <HomeIcon />

      {/* Outlined — minimal stroke-style, for supporting UI */}
      <HomeOutlinedIcon />

      {/* Sizing via fontSize prop */}
      <SearchIcon fontSize="small" />   {/* 20px */}
      <SearchIcon fontSize="medium" />  {/* 24px default */}
      <SearchIcon fontSize="large" />   {/* 35px */}
      <SearchIcon sx={{ fontSize: 48 }} />

      {/* Color via MUI theme tokens or custom hex */}
      <DeleteIcon color="error" />
      <DeleteIcon sx={{ color: '#6366f1' }} />
    </div>
  )
}
Feather Icons Integration
import { Home } from 'react-feather'

export default function App() {
  return <Home size={24} />
}

FINAL VERDICT: WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?

Still undecided? Here is our definitive breakdown of when to use Material Icons versus when to opt for Feather Icons.

CHOOSE MATERIAL ICONS IF...
5 style variants per icon — Filled, Outlined, Rounded, Sharp, TwoTone from one package
Most downloaded React icon package — 5.1M weekly npm installs, 98K GitHub stars
Native MUI integration — sx prop, theme color tokens, fontSize scale all work out of the box
Google's official Material Design visual language — recognized by billions of Android and web users
Works in Next.js Server Components — renders static SVG HTML with no use client required
Full TypeScript support — SvgIconProps type covers sx, color, fontSize, and className
CHOOSE FEATHER ICONS IF...
Minimal and clean
Lightweight
High GitHub stars

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Which is better: Material Icons or Feather Icons?

Choosing between Material Icons and Feather Icons depends entirely on your project's technical requirements and design aesthetic. Material Icons provides 2,100 icons and is notable for 5 style variants per icon — filled, outlined, rounded, sharp, twotone from one package, while Feather Icons offers 287 icons and is best known for minimal and clean.

Are Material Icons and Feather Icons completely free to use?

Yes. Both libraries are highly permissive open-source projects. Material Icons is licensed under MIT, and Feather Icons is licensed under MIT. Both licenses permit free commercial usage, modification, and redistribution in both personal and enterprise projects.

Do these libraries support TypeScript natively?

Yes, Material Icons includes excellent built-in TypeScript definitions. Meanwhile, Feather Icons also lacks strict built-in TypeScript support.

NPM INSTALLATION COMMANDS

Install Material Icons
npm install @mui/icons-material @mui/material @emotion/styled @emotion/react
Install Feather Icons
npm install react-feather

RELATED RESOURCES

Material Icons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideFeather Icons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideSearch 15,000+ Icons Across All Libraries InstantlyIcon Library License Guide — MIT vs Apache vs ISC ExplainedFind the Best Icons For Your Project — Interactive Wizard

EXPLORE MORE COMPARISONS

Material Icons vs Lucide IconsMaterial Icons vs HeroiconsMaterial Icons vs Tabler IconsMaterial Icons vs Phosphor IconsMaterial Icons vs Remix IconMaterial Icons vs Bootstrap IconsMaterial Icons vs Radix IconsMaterial Icons vs Font AwesomeMaterial Icons vs React IconsMaterial Icons vs IconifyMaterial Icons vs Simple IconsMaterial Icons vs Iconoir