// IN-DEPTH ICON LIBRARY COMPARISON

Octicons vs Iconify (2026)

When building modern web applications, choosing the right icon library can significantly impact both your application's aesthetic and its performance. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit Octicons against Iconify to help you make an informed decision for your React, Next.js, Vue, or Svelte project.

Together, these libraries represent some of the most popular open-source UI assets available today. Octicons boasts an impressive 280 icons (licensed under MIT), while Iconify counters with 350,000 highly-polished icons (licensed under MIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses).

Below, we dive into the technical details: bundle size impacts, tree-shaking capabilities, TypeScript support, explicit commercial licensing rules, and real-world implementation examples.

Octicons
280
icons
10,400 stars · MIT
View full guide →
VS
Iconify
350,000
icons
5,162 stars · MIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses
View full guide →

TECHNICAL FEATURE COMPARISON

When comparing Octicons and Iconify, developer experience features like TypeScript definitions and tree-shaking support are just as important as the icon count. Review the matrix below to see how they stack up.

FEATURE
Octicons
Iconify
Total Icons
280
350,000
GitHub Stars
10,400
5,162
License
MIT
MIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses
TypeScript
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Tree Shakable
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Figma Plugin
✗ No
✓ Yes
Styles
outline
outline, filled, duotone, brands, any
Frameworks
react, vue, nextjs, jekyll
react, nextjs, vue, svelte

LICENSING & COMMERCIAL USE DEEP-DIVE

Legal compliance is critical when selecting assets for a commercial software project. Understanding the nuances between the MIT license used by Octicons and the MIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses license used by Iconify will ensure your project remains risk-free.

OcticonsMIT

Octicons uses the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses. You can use it in any commercial project, modify the icons, and redistribute them freely. The only requirement is preserving the copyright notice in copies of the software.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
IconifyMIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses

Iconify uses the MIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses license, a permissive open-source license that allows free commercial use in web and mobile applications.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
Read our complete Icon Library License Guide (MIT vs ISC vs Apache) →

PERFORMANCE & BUNDLE SIZE

Modern front-end frameworks like React and Next.js heavily penalize large JavaScript bundles. This makes tree-shaking—the ability of a bundler to remove unused code—a crucial factor when choosing between Octicons and Iconify.

  • Octicons Performance: Because Octicons supports tree-shaking, importing a single icon will only add a tiny fraction of a kilobyte to your final bundle. You can safely install the entire package without performance concerns.
  • Iconify Performance: Similarly, Iconify is fully tree-shakable. Your Webpack or Turbopack build step will strip out any unused icons, ensuring your First Contentful Paint (FCP) metrics remain exceptional.

REACT IMPORT SYNTAX & INTEGRATION

Here is how you actually write the code to import and use each library in a React or Next.js component. Both libraries offer distinct APIs and integration patterns.

Octicons Integration
import { RepoIcon } from '@primer/octicons-react'

export default function App() {
  return <RepoIcon size={16} />
}
Iconify Integration
import { Icon } from '@iconify/react'

// Access 350,000+ icons with one component
// Format: prefix:icon-name
export default function App() {
  return (
    <div>
      {/* Lucide Icons */}
      <Icon icon="lucide:home" width={24} height={24} />

      {/* Material Design Icons */}
      <Icon icon="mdi:account-circle" width={24} />

      {/* Font Awesome Solid */}
      <Icon icon="fa6-solid:house" width={20} />

      {/* Simple Icons (brand logos) */}
      <Icon icon="simple-icons:github" width={24} />

      {/* With color and className */}
      <Icon icon="lucide:bell" className="h-5 w-5 text-gray-500" />
      <Icon icon="mdi:check-circle" color="#4ade80" width={20} />
    </div>
  )
}

FINAL VERDICT: WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?

Still undecided? Here is our definitive breakdown of when to use Octicons versus when to opt for Iconify.

CHOOSE OCTICONS IF...
Designed on strict 16px and 24px grid systems to prevent rendering blurriness
Specialized Git workflow, repo, pull-request, and codebase symbols
Maintained directly by GitHub's design systems team
Built-in semantic accessibility descriptions and aria attributes
CHOOSE ICONIFY IF...
350,000+ icons from 211 sets through one component — Lucide, MDI, Font Awesome, Tabler and more
Zero bundle cost in API mode — only the 15KB renderer ships, icon data loads on demand
Official packages for React, Vue, Svelte, SolidJS, Angular, and vanilla HTML web component
Unified prefix:name syntax — "lucide:home", "mdi:account", "fa6-solid:house" — one API for all sets
All 211 icon sets automatically kept up to date without npm package updates
Iconify Figma plugin lets designers browse all sets and export icon names for developers

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Which is better: Octicons or Iconify?

Choosing between Octicons and Iconify depends entirely on your project's technical requirements and design aesthetic. Octicons provides 280 icons and is notable for designed on strict 16px and 24px grid systems to prevent rendering blurriness, while Iconify offers 350,000 icons and is best known for 350,000+ icons from 211 sets through one component — lucide, mdi, font awesome, tabler and more.

Are Octicons and Iconify completely free to use?

Yes. Both libraries are highly permissive open-source projects. Octicons is licensed under MIT, and Iconify is licensed under MIT (framework) — icon sets retain their original licenses. Both licenses permit free commercial usage, modification, and redistribution in both personal and enterprise projects.

Do these libraries support TypeScript natively?

Yes, Octicons includes excellent built-in TypeScript definitions. Similarly, Iconify offers robust native TypeScript support for an improved developer experience.

OUR RECOMMENDATION

✓ CHOOSE OCTICONS IF YOU...
  • Need a library with 280 icons and outline style options
  • Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
  • Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
  • Are building with react, vue, nextjs, jekyll
✓ CHOOSE ICONIFY IF YOU...
  • Need a library with 350,000 icons and outline/filled/duotone/brands/any style options
  • Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
  • Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
  • Are building with react, nextjs, vue, svelte
  • Need a Figma plugin for designer-developer handoff

Still unsure? Try our interactive quiz to get a personalized recommendation, or search 350,000+ icons from both libraries side by side. You can also check our live stats dashboard for real-time download and GitHub star trends.

NPM INSTALLATION COMMANDS

Install Octicons
npm install @primer/octicons-react
Install Iconify
npm install @iconify/react

RELATED RESOURCES

Octicons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideIconify — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideSearch 15,000+ Icons Across All Libraries InstantlyIcon Library License Guide — MIT vs Apache vs ISC ExplainedFind the Best Icons For Your Project — Interactive Wizard

EXPLORE MORE COMPARISONS

Octicons vs Lucide IconsOcticons vs HeroiconsOcticons vs Tabler IconsOcticons vs Phosphor IconsOcticons vs Remix IconOcticons vs Feather IconsOcticons vs Bootstrap IconsOcticons vs Radix IconsOcticons vs Font AwesomeOcticons vs React IconsOcticons vs Material IconsOcticons vs Simple IconsOcticons vs IconoirOcticons vs IonIcons