// IN-DEPTH ICON LIBRARY COMPARISON

Simple Icons vs Octicons (2026)

When building modern web applications, choosing the right icon library can significantly impact both your application's aesthetic and its performance. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit Simple Icons against Octicons to help you make an informed decision for your React, Next.js, Vue, or Svelte project.

Together, these libraries represent some of the most popular open-source UI assets available today. Simple Icons boasts an impressive 3,200 icons (licensed under CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)), while Octicons counters with 280 highly-polished icons (licensed under MIT).

Below, we dive into the technical details: bundle size impacts, tree-shaking capabilities, TypeScript support, explicit commercial licensing rules, and real-world implementation examples.

Simple Icons
3,200
icons
25,047 stars · CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)
View full guide →
VS
Octicons
280
icons
10,400 stars · MIT
View full guide →

TECHNICAL FEATURE COMPARISON

When comparing Simple Icons and Octicons, developer experience features like TypeScript definitions and tree-shaking support are just as important as the icon count. Review the matrix below to see how they stack up.

FEATURE
Simple Icons
Octicons
Total Icons
3,200
280
GitHub Stars
25,047
10,400
License
CC0 1.0 (Public Domain)
MIT
TypeScript
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Tree Shakable
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
Figma Plugin
✗ No
✗ No
Styles
filled
outline
Frameworks
react, nextjs
react, vue, nextjs, jekyll

LICENSING & COMMERCIAL USE DEEP-DIVE

Legal compliance is critical when selecting assets for a commercial software project. Understanding the nuances between the CC0 1.0 (Public Domain) license used by Simple Icons and the MIT license used by Octicons will ensure your project remains risk-free.

Simple IconsCC0 1.0 (Public Domain)

Simple Icons uses CC0 1.0 (Public Domain). All copyrights have been waived. You can copy, modify, distribute, and use the icons for any purpose — including commercial — without attribution.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
OcticonsMIT

Octicons uses the MIT License — one of the most permissive open-source licenses. You can use it in any commercial project, modify the icons, and redistribute them freely. The only requirement is preserving the copyright notice in copies of the software.

✓ COMMERCIAL USE
Free for personal, commercial, and SaaS projects without recurring fees.
Read our complete Icon Library License Guide (MIT vs ISC vs Apache) →

PERFORMANCE & BUNDLE SIZE

Modern front-end frameworks like React and Next.js heavily penalize large JavaScript bundles. This makes tree-shaking—the ability of a bundler to remove unused code—a crucial factor when choosing between Simple Icons and Octicons.

  • Simple Icons Performance: Because Simple Icons supports tree-shaking, importing a single icon will only add a tiny fraction of a kilobyte to your final bundle. You can safely install the entire package without performance concerns.
  • Octicons Performance: Similarly, Octicons is fully tree-shakable. Your Webpack or Turbopack build step will strip out any unused icons, ensuring your First Contentful Paint (FCP) metrics remain exceptional.

REACT IMPORT SYNTAX & INTEGRATION

Here is how you actually write the code to import and use each library in a React or Next.js component. Both libraries offer distinct APIs and integration patterns.

Simple Icons Integration
import {
  SiGithub,
  SiVercel,
  SiStripe,
  SiReact,
  SiNextdotjs,
  SiTailwindcss,
} from '@icons-pack/react-simple-icons'
// All components use 'Si' prefix + PascalCase brand name

export function TechStack() {
  return (
    <div className="flex items-center gap-4">
      {/* Use currentColor — inherits from parent */}
      <SiGithub size={24} />
      <SiVercel size={24} />

      {/* Use official brand color */}
      <SiStripe size={24} color="#635BFF" />
      <SiReact size={24} color="#61DAFB" />

      {/* Social links row */}
      <a href="https://github.com" aria-label="GitHub">
        <SiGithub size={20} className="text-gray-600 hover:text-gray-900" />
      </a>
    </div>
  )
}
Octicons Integration
import { RepoIcon } from '@primer/octicons-react'

export default function App() {
  return <RepoIcon size={16} />
}

FINAL VERDICT: WHICH SHOULD YOU CHOOSE?

Still undecided? Here is our definitive breakdown of when to use Simple Icons versus when to opt for Octicons.

CHOOSE SIMPLE ICONS IF...
3,109 brand icons — 6x more than Font Awesome Brands (465) at zero cost
CC0 public domain — no attribution required, no license notices, use in any commercial project
Official brand hex colors included — render SiStripe in #635BFF, SiGithub in #181717 with one prop
Works in Next.js Server Components — renders static SVG HTML with no use client required
Full TypeScript support — all 3,109 Si-prefixed components are typed with full VS Code autocomplete
Actively maintained — new brand icons added regularly, existing icons updated on rebrands
CHOOSE OCTICONS IF...
Designed on strict 16px and 24px grid systems to prevent rendering blurriness
Specialized Git workflow, repo, pull-request, and codebase symbols
Maintained directly by GitHub's design systems team
Built-in semantic accessibility descriptions and aria attributes

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Which is better: Simple Icons or Octicons?

Choosing between Simple Icons and Octicons depends entirely on your project's technical requirements and design aesthetic. Simple Icons provides 3,200 icons and is notable for 3,109 brand icons — 6x more than font awesome brands (465) at zero cost, while Octicons offers 280 icons and is best known for designed on strict 16px and 24px grid systems to prevent rendering blurriness.

Are Simple Icons and Octicons completely free to use?

Yes. Both libraries are highly permissive open-source projects. Simple Icons is licensed under CC0 1.0 (Public Domain), and Octicons is licensed under MIT. Both licenses permit free commercial usage, modification, and redistribution in both personal and enterprise projects.

Do these libraries support TypeScript natively?

Yes, Simple Icons includes excellent built-in TypeScript definitions. Similarly, Octicons offers robust native TypeScript support for an improved developer experience.

OUR RECOMMENDATION

✓ CHOOSE SIMPLE ICONS IF YOU...
  • Need a library with 3,200 icons and filled style options
  • Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
  • Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
  • Are building with react, nextjs
✓ CHOOSE OCTICONS IF YOU...
  • Need a library with 280 icons and outline style options
  • Want tree-shakable imports to keep bundles small
  • Require first-class TypeScript support in your codebase
  • Are building with react, vue, nextjs, jekyll

Still unsure? Try our interactive quiz to get a personalized recommendation, or search 350,000+ icons from both libraries side by side. You can also check our live stats dashboard for real-time download and GitHub star trends.

NPM INSTALLATION COMMANDS

Install Simple Icons
npm install @icons-pack/react-simple-icons
Install Octicons
npm install @primer/octicons-react

RELATED RESOURCES

Simple Icons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideOcticons — Comprehensive License, Installation & React GuideSearch 15,000+ Icons Across All Libraries InstantlyIcon Library License Guide — MIT vs Apache vs ISC ExplainedFind the Best Icons For Your Project — Interactive Wizard

EXPLORE MORE COMPARISONS

Simple Icons vs Lucide IconsSimple Icons vs HeroiconsSimple Icons vs Tabler IconsSimple Icons vs Phosphor IconsSimple Icons vs Remix IconSimple Icons vs Feather IconsSimple Icons vs Bootstrap IconsSimple Icons vs Radix IconsSimple Icons vs Font AwesomeSimple Icons vs React IconsSimple Icons vs Material IconsSimple Icons vs IconifySimple Icons vs IconoirSimple Icons vs IonIcons